Most Expensive Metro Areas for Pet Care

All metro areas ranked by pet care price index — where grooming, boarding, and veterinary services cost the most.

What This Ranking Tells Us

Pet care costs vary dramatically across U.S. metro areas, driven by local labor costs, real estate prices, and the overall cost of living. Metros topping this list typically have high costs of living across all categories, with pet care prices reflecting the premium that groomers, trainers, and veterinarians charge in expensive markets. The price index is relative to the national average (1.0x), so a metro at 1.5x means pet care services cost roughly 50% more than the national average.

# Name Price Index
1 New York NY 1.50x
2 San Francisco CA 1.48x
3 San Jose CA 1.45x
4 Bellevue WA 1.42x
5 Honolulu HI 1.42x
6 Fremont CA 1.40x
7 Oakland CA 1.40x
8 Boston MA 1.38x
9 Irvine CA 1.35x
10 Stamford CT 1.35x
11 Washington DC 1.35x
12 Seattle WA 1.33x
13 Los Angeles CA 1.32x
14 Santa Rosa CA 1.30x
15 Anchorage AK 1.30x
16 San Diego CA 1.30x
17 Miami FL 1.28x
18 Boulder CO 1.25x
19 Oxnard CA 1.20x
20 Hialeah FL 1.18x
21 Denver CO 1.18x
22 Bend OR 1.15x
23 Worcester MA 1.15x
24 Tacoma WA 1.15x
25 Sacramento CA 1.15x
26 Portland OR 1.15x
27 Naperville IL 1.12x
28 Hartford CT 1.12x
29 Austin TX 1.12x
30 Santa Fe NM 1.10x
31 Scottsdale AZ 1.10x
32 Minneapolis MN 1.10x
33 Chicago IL 1.10x
34 Ann Arbor MI 1.08x
35 Boise ID 1.08x
36 Salt Lake City UT 1.08x
37 Providence RI 1.08x
38 Baltimore MD 1.08x
39 Philadelphia PA 1.08x
40 Raleigh NC 1.06x
41 Nashville TN 1.06x
42 Eugene OR 1.05x
43 Provo UT 1.05x
44 Plano TX 1.05x
45 Las Vegas NV 1.05x
46 Charlotte NC 1.05x
47 Henderson NV 1.02x
48 Reno NV 1.02x
49 Atlanta GA 1.02x
50 Dallas TX 1.02x
51 Asheville NC 1.02x
52 Gilbert AZ 1.00x
53 Durham NC 1.00x
54 Colorado Springs CO 1.00x
55 St. Petersburg FL 0.98x
56 Chandler AZ 0.98x
57 Charleston SC 0.98x
58 Tampa FL 0.98x
59 Phoenix AZ 0.98x
60 Orlando FL 0.97x
61 Arlington TX 0.96x
62 Stockton CA 0.96x
63 Fort Worth TX 0.96x
64 Cape Coral FL 0.95x
65 Madison WI 0.95x
66 Richmond VA 0.95x
67 Houston TX 0.95x
68 Jacksonville FL 0.93x
69 Overland Park KS 0.92x
70 Norfolk VA 0.92x
71 Bakersfield CA 0.92x
72 New Orleans LA 0.92x
73 Spokane WA 0.92x
74 Milwaukee WI 0.92x
75 Columbus OH 0.92x
76 San Antonio TX 0.92x
77 Albany NY 0.90x
78 Savannah GA 0.90x
79 Grand Rapids MI 0.90x
80 Pittsburgh PA 0.90x
81 Indianapolis IN 0.90x
82 Tallahassee FL 0.88x
83 Kansas City MO 0.88x
84 Omaha NE 0.88x
85 Rochester NY 0.88x
86 Buffalo NY 0.88x
87 Syracuse NY 0.88x
88 Lexington KY 0.88x
89 Des Moines IA 0.88x
90 Tucson AZ 0.88x
91 Albuquerque NM 0.88x
92 Sioux Falls SD 0.86x
93 Lincoln NE 0.86x
94 Tulsa OK 0.86x
95 Knoxville TN 0.86x
96 Baton Rouge LA 0.84x
97 Detroit MI 0.84x
98 Cincinnati OH 0.84x
99 Cleveland OH 0.84x
100 St. Louis MO 0.84x
101 Louisville KY 0.84x
102 Oklahoma City OK 0.84x
103 Waco TX 0.82x
104 Fayetteville NC 0.82x
105 Dayton OH 0.82x
106 Akron OH 0.82x
107 Huntsville AL 0.82x
108 Birmingham AL 0.82x
109 Wichita KS 0.82x
110 Memphis TN 0.82x
111 Topeka KS 0.80x
112 Toledo OH 0.80x
113 Corpus Christi TX 0.80x
114 Little Rock AR 0.80x
115 El Paso TX 0.80x
116 Montgomery AL 0.78x
117 Mobile AL 0.78x
118 Shreveport LA 0.78x
119 Lubbock TX 0.78x
120 Jackson MS 0.76x
121 Laredo TX 0.76x

Source: Industry pricing data aggregated from pet service providers across 121 U.S. metro areas.

How to Read This Ranking

This table ranks 121 entries in the PlainPetCare dataset by price index. The top entry, New York, posts a price index of 1.50x, while the bottom entry in this list, Laredo, sits at 0.76x. Rankings like this are most useful when you read them alongside the underlying price ranges on each breed or metro page — the aggregate score hides detail that matters for individual budgeting.

Pet care costs vary dramatically across U.S. metro areas, driven by local labor costs, real estate prices, and the overall cost of living. Metros topping this list typically have high costs of living across all categories, with pet care prices reflecting the premium that groomers, trainers, and veterinarians charge in expensive markets. The price index is relative to the national average (1.0x), so a metro at 1.5x means pet care services cost roughly 50% more than the national average.

To get the most out of this ranking, click through to any row to see the full service-by-service breakdown. Each metro page shows a complete pricing table by size and service type, which is where real budgeting decisions actually get made. Aggregated ranks are useful for scanning the market; itemised tables are where you plan spend. Source: Industry pricing data aggregated from pet service providers across 121 U.S. metro areas.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the price index measure?

The price index compares local pet care costs to the national average (1.0x). A metro with a 1.5x index means pet grooming, boarding, and care services cost approximately 50% more than the national average. The index accounts for multiple service types and dog sizes to provide a comprehensive cost comparison.

Why is pet care so expensive in some cities?

The biggest cost drivers are labor (groomer wages follow local wage levels), commercial rent (grooming salons in high-rent areas pass costs to customers), cost of living adjustments, and local demand. Cities with high concentrations of pet owners and disposable income also see premium pricing. New York, San Francisco, and other coastal metros consistently rank highest.

Can I save money by choosing a cheaper metro for pet care?

While relocating for pet care savings alone is unlikely, pet owners in expensive metros can save by scheduling services during off-peak times, choosing mobile groomers (lower overhead), learning basic grooming at home, and booking package deals rather than individual appointments.

Related

Data sourced from official state veterinary boards and AVMA accreditation registries. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Source: ASPCA / U.S. State Veterinary Boards Veterinary service pricing transparency by region · 2025